Anda Mencari Jasa Konsultan ISO 9001 di Balikpapan Kami Solusinya Hubungi : 0857 1027 2813 konsultaniso9001.net adalah Jasa Konsultan ISO 9001, Consultant ISO 14001, Konsultan ISO 22000, OHSAS 18001, Penyusunan Dokumen CSMS-K3LL, K3, ISO/TS 16949,Dll yang BERANI memberikan JAMINAN KELULUSAN & MONEYBACK GUARANTEE ( Tanpa Terkecuali ) yang tertuang dalam kontrak kerja. Sebagai Konsultan ISO dan HSE TERBAIK dan BERPENGALAMAN kami siap membantu perusahaan bapak dan ibu dalam membangun sistem manajemen ISO dan HSE dengan pendekatan yang sistematis tanpa ribet dengan tujuan bagaimana sistem ISO tersebut bisa bermanfaat bagi perkembangan perusahaan serta menjadi pondasi yang kuat untuk kemajuan perusahaan.

Jasa Konsultan ISO 9001 di Balikpapan Melalui berbagai TRAINING ISO yang diselenggarakan menggunakan Metode Accelerated Learning, sehingga Karyawan Dipacu untuk lebih aktif dalam pembelajaran sehingga dapat menerapkan Sistem ini dengan Baik Nantinya. Jasa Konsultan ISO 9001 di Balikpapan

Tag :
Konsultan ISO 9001 | Jasa Konsultan ISO 9001 di Balikpapan

Konsultasi ISO 9001 Terbaik dan Berpengalaman di Jawa Tengah

Konsultasi ISO 9001 Terbaik dan Berpengalaman di Jawa Tengah | Hubungi : 0857 1027 2813 PT Bintang Solusi Utama adalah Jasa Konsultan ISO 9001, Consultant ISO 14001, Konsultan ISO 22000, OHSAS 18001, Penyusunan Dokumen CSMS-K3LL, K3, ISO/TS 16949,Dll yang BERANI memberikan JAMINAN KELULUSAN & MONEYBACK GUARANTEE ( Tanpa Terkecuali ) yang tertuang dalam kontrak kerja. Sebagai Konsultan ISO dan HSE TERBAIK dan BERPENGALAMAN kami siap membantu perusahaan bapak dan ibu dalam membangun sistem manajemen ISO dan HSE dengan pendekatan yang sistematis tanpa ribet dengan tujuan bagaimana sistem ISO tersebut bisa bermanfaat bagi perkembangan perusahaan serta menjadi pondasi yang kuat untuk kemajuan perusahaan. Konsultasi ISO 9001 Terbaik dan Berpengalaman di Jawa Tengah

Buah tomat sejatinya menjadi makanan wajib bagi kaum pria.

Saco-Indonesia.com - Buah tomat sejatinya menjadi makanan wajib bagi kaum pria. Pasalnya, dalam buah ini terkandung banyak manfaat bagi kesehatan tubuh, di antaranya adalah mencegah penyakit kanker prostat.

Berbagai literatur ilmiah menyebutkan dalam tomat terkandung zat yang bernama lycopene. Zat alami ini sebenarnya dapat ditemukan bukan hanya pada tomat, melainkan buah atau sayur berwarna merah kekuningan. 

Tomat sendiri sudah sejak lama digadang-gadang sebagai buah yang efektif dalam membantu mencegah kanker prostat. Maklum saja, dalam buah bernama asing Lyporsicon esculentum ini terkandung 45.902 mikrogtam lycopene per 100 gram penyajian.

"Zat lycopene akan menjadi antioksidan, yang membantu tubuh melawan kanker," kata pakar onkologi medik, Dr. Aru Wisaksono Sudoyo, SpPD, KHOM, FACP pada seminar Kanker Prostat Pembunuh Lelaki yang Datang Diam-Diam, Rabu (15/5.2013) di Jakarta.

Aru memaparkan, di dalam tubuh lycopene disimpan dalam lever, paru-paru, usus besar, dan kulit. Bukti manfaat lycopene di antaranya pernah diungkap dalam hasil penelitian yang dimuat Asia Pacific Journal of Clinical Nutrition. Penelitian ini melibatkan 130 pasien kanker prostat yang diberi makanan yang tinggi kandungan lycopene .

Hasilnya, para responden mengalami penurunan risiko perkembangan sel-sel kanker prostat hingga 82 persen. Lycopene juga ditemukan dalam buah pepaya dan ikan salmon.

Aru menjelaskan, untuk mendapat manfaat maksimal dari buah tomat,  sebelum mengkonsumsi sebaiknya tomat direndam dahulu dalam air mendidih. Pemanasan akan membantu lycopene terlepas dari buah. "Kalau sudah terlepas tentu lebih mudah masuk ke dalam tubuh.

Oleh karena itu, lebih baik memakan tomat yang sudah diolah, seperti dalam sup atau saus pasta," katanya.

Aru juga mengingatkan untuk menghindari makanan berbahan pengawet dan pewarna. Kandungan formalin, rhodamin B, dan methanil yellow menjadi pemicu tumbuhnya sel kanker pada tubuh. "Intinya hindari makanan dan minuman berbahan kimia tidak jelas. Bahan kimia tersebut dikhawatirkan bersifat memicu kanker (karsinogenik)," kata Aru.

Pola hidup sehat menjadi kunci melawan kanker prostat. Aru juga menyarankan untuk tidak merokok dan rajin terkena sinar matahari. Kertas rokok mengandung 200-300 racun yang berbahaya bagi tubuh. Sementara sinar matahari membantu tubuh meningkatkan daya tahan tubuh.

 

Editor :Liwon Maulana(galipat)
Sumber:Kompas.com

saco-indonesia.com, Warga Lampung telah menjadi korban kajahatan pmbiusan di Bogor.  Oleh pelaku, korban telah dibuang di s

saco-indonesia.com, Warga Lampung telah menjadi korban kajahatan pmbiusan di Bogor.  Oleh pelaku, korban telah dibuang di samping Perumahan Tanah Baru Indah RT  02/04 Kelurahan Tanah Baru Kecamatan Bogor Utara Kota Bogor.

Korban pemegang yang bernama Ir Reyi Akmal Yudha Putra, berusia usia 48 tahun. Korban juga merupakan PNS Tanjung Karang Lampung dengan jabatan Kepala Bidang Produksi Perkebunan.

Warga Jalan Wae Umpu Nomor 22 RT 06/01 Kelurahan Paloman Kecamatan Teluk Bitung Utara Bandar Lampung ini juga sempat mendapat pertolongan medis di RS PMI Bbogor.

Saat sadar dari pengaruh hipnotis ia lalu dibawa ke Mapolsek Bogor Utara guna untuk dimintai keterangan.

Kepada polisi, korban telah menuturkan, ia naik mobil sewaan dari bandara Soekarno-Hatta Cengkareng menuju Bogor untuk urusan dinas.

Di jalan, ia telah ditawarkan minuman oleh sopir dan beberapa lelaki yang juga mengaku sebagai penumpang. Tanpa curiga, korban telah menerima air mineral dan meminum. “Saat minum itu dia langsung hilang kesadaran,”kata AKP Indraningtyas, Kapolsek Bogor Utara.

Korban diakui AKP Indraningtyas, juga telah menderita luka pada jidatnya. Luka ini diduga diderita korban, saat dilempar pelaku dari dalam mobil.

“Beberapa pria dalam mobil berbincang dengan korban telah memperkenalkan diri sebagai penumpang dengan tujuan Bogor. Korban yang juga penumpang lalu terlibat pembicaraan. Nggak tahunya pria dalam mobil tersebut , ternyata teman sopir yang jadi pelaku,” paparnya.

Tas serta dompet korban telah dibawa pelaku. Kepada petugas korban juga mengaku, dompet yang berisi sejumlah surat identitas dirinya dan beberapa kartu ATM dan uang jutaan rupiah.

Hasil olah TKP dan keterangan beberapa warga, mereka tidak melihat kejadian secara langsung. Hanya melihat sebuah mobil Avanza yang bergerak dari samping perumahan.

Mobil merek Toyoya ini, sesuai dengan pernyataan korban. “Hanya warga tidak ada yang tahu berapa nomor polisi mobil,” papar AKP Indraningtyas Kamis malam.


Editor : Dian Sukmawati

WASHINGTON — The former deputy director of the C.I.A. asserts in a forthcoming book that Republicans, in their eagerness to politicize the killing of the American ambassador to Libya, repeatedly distorted the agency’s analysis of events. But he also argues that the C.I.A. should get out of the business of providing “talking points” for administration officials in national security events that quickly become partisan, as happened after the Benghazi attack in 2012.

The official, Michael J. Morell, dismisses the allegation that the United States military and C.I.A. officers “were ordered to stand down and not come to the rescue of their comrades,” and he says there is “no evidence” to support the charge that “there was a conspiracy between C.I.A. and the White House to spin the Benghazi story in a way that would protect the political interests of the president and Secretary Clinton,” referring to the secretary of state at the time, Hillary Rodham Clinton.

But he also concludes that the White House itself embellished some of the talking points provided by the Central Intelligence Agency and had blocked him from sending an internal study of agency conclusions to Congress.

Photo
 
Michael J. Morell Credit Mark Wilson/Getty Images

“I finally did so without asking,” just before leaving government, he writes, and after the White House released internal emails to a committee investigating the State Department’s handling of the issue.

A lengthy congressional investigation remains underway, one that many Republicans hope to use against Mrs. Clinton in the 2016 election cycle.

In parts of the book, “The Great War of Our Time” (Twelve), Mr. Morell praises his C.I.A. colleagues for many successes in stopping terrorist attacks, but he is surprisingly critical of other C.I.A. failings — and those of the National Security Agency.

Soon after Mr. Morell retired in 2013 after 33 years in the agency, President Obama appointed him to a commission reviewing the actions of the National Security Agency after the disclosures of Edward J. Snowden, a former intelligence contractor who released classified documents about the government’s eavesdropping abilities. Mr. Morell writes that he was surprised by what he found.

Advertisement

“You would have thought that of all the government entities on the planet, the one least vulnerable to such grand theft would have been the N.S.A.,” he writes. “But it turned out that the N.S.A. had left itself vulnerable.”

He concludes that most Wall Street firms had better cybersecurity than the N.S.A. had when Mr. Snowden swept information from its systems in 2013. While he said he found himself “chagrined by how well the N.S.A. was doing” compared with the C.I.A. in stepping up its collection of data on intelligence targets, he also sensed that the N.S.A., which specializes in electronic spying, was operating without considering the implications of its methods.

“The N.S.A. had largely been collecting information because it could, not necessarily in all cases because it should,” he says.

The book is to be released next week.

Mr. Morell was a career analyst who rose through the ranks of the agency, and he ended up in the No. 2 post. He served as President George W. Bush’s personal intelligence briefer in the first months of his presidency — in those days, he could often be spotted at the Starbucks in Waco, Tex., catching up on his reading — and was with him in the schoolhouse in Florida on the morning of Sept. 11, 2001, when the Bush presidency changed in an instant.

Mr. Morell twice took over as acting C.I.A. director, first when Leon E. Panetta was appointed secretary of defense and then when retired Gen. David H. Petraeus resigned over an extramarital affair with his biographer, a relationship that included his handing her classified notes of his time as America’s best-known military commander.

Mr. Morell says he first learned of the affair from Mr. Petraeus only the night before he resigned, and just as the Benghazi events were turning into a political firestorm. While praising Mr. Petraeus, who had told his deputy “I am very lucky” to run the C.I.A., Mr. Morell writes that “the organization did not feel the same way about him.” The former general “created the impression through the tone of his voice and his body language that he did not want people to disagree with him (which was not true in my own interaction with him),” he says.

But it is his account of the Benghazi attacks — and how the C.I.A. was drawn into the debate over whether the Obama White House deliberately distorted its account of the death of Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens — that is bound to attract attention, at least partly because of its relevance to the coming presidential election. The initial assessments that the C.I.A. gave to the White House said demonstrations had preceded the attack. By the time analysts reversed their opinion, Susan E. Rice, now the national security adviser, had made a series of statements on Sunday talk shows describing the initial assessment. The controversy and other comments Ms. Rice made derailed Mr. Obama’s plan to appoint her as secretary of state.

The experience prompted Mr. Morell to write that the C.I.A. should stay out of the business of preparing talking points — especially on issues that are being seized upon for “political purposes.” He is critical of the State Department for not beefing up security in Libya for its diplomats, as the C.I.A., he said, did for its employees.

But he concludes that the assault in which the ambassador was killed took place “with little or no advance planning” and “was not well organized.” He says the attackers “did not appear to be looking for Americans to harm. They appeared intent on looting and conducting some vandalism,” setting fires that killed Mr. Stevens and a security official, Sean Smith.

Mr. Morell paints a picture of an agency that was struggling, largely unsuccessfully, to understand dynamics in the Middle East and North Africa when the Arab Spring broke out in late 2011 in Tunisia. The agency’s analysts failed to see the forces of revolution coming — and then failed again, he writes, when they told Mr. Obama that the uprisings would undercut Al Qaeda by showing there was a democratic pathway to change.

“There is no good explanation for our not being able to see the pressures growing to dangerous levels across the region,” he writes. The agency had again relied too heavily “on a handful of strong leaders in the countries of concern to help us understand what was going on in the Arab street,” he says, and those leaders themselves were clueless.

Moreover, an agency that has always overvalued secretly gathered intelligence and undervalued “open source” material “was not doing enough to mine the wealth of information available through social media,” he writes. “We thought and told policy makers that this outburst of popular revolt would damage Al Qaeda by undermining the group’s narrative,” he writes.

Instead, weak governments in Egypt, and the absence of governance from Libya to Yemen, were “a boon to Islamic extremists across both the Middle East and North Africa.”

Mr. Morell is gentle about most of the politicians he dealt with — he expresses admiration for both Mr. Bush and Mr. Obama, though he accuses former Vice President Dick Cheney of deliberately implying a connection between Al Qaeda and Iraq that the C.I.A. had concluded probably did not exist. But when it comes to the events leading up to the Bush administration’s decision to go to war in Iraq, he is critical of his own agency.

Mr. Morell concludes that the Bush White House did not have to twist intelligence on Saddam Hussein’s alleged effort to rekindle the country’s work on weapons of mass destruction.

“The view that hard-liners in the Bush administration forced the intelligence community into its position on W.M.D. is just flat wrong,” he writes. “No one pushed. The analysts were already there and they had been there for years, long before Bush came to office.”

A 2-minute-42-second demo recording captured in one take turned out to be a one-hit wonder for Mr. Ely, who was 19 when he sang the garage-band classic.

Artikel lainnya »