Anda Mencari Pusat Jasa Konsultan ISO 9001 Berpengalaman di Gorontalo Utara Kami Solusinya Hubungi : 0857 1027 2813 konsultaniso9001.net adalah Jasa Konsultan ISO 9001, Consultant ISO 14001, Konsultan ISO 22000, OHSAS 18001, Penyusunan Dokumen CSMS-K3LL, K3, ISO/TS 16949,Dll yang BERANI memberikan JAMINAN KELULUSAN & MONEYBACK GUARANTEE ( Tanpa Terkecuali ) yang tertuang dalam kontrak kerja. Sebagai Konsultan ISO dan HSE TERBAIK dan BERPENGALAMAN kami siap membantu perusahaan bapak dan ibu dalam membangun sistem manajemen ISO dan HSE dengan pendekatan yang sistematis tanpa ribet dengan tujuan bagaimana sistem ISO tersebut bisa bermanfaat bagi perkembangan perusahaan serta menjadi pondasi yang kuat untuk kemajuan perusahaan.

Pusat Jasa Konsultan ISO 9001 Berpengalaman di Gorontalo Utara Melalui berbagai TRAINING ISO yang diselenggarakan menggunakan Metode Accelerated Learning, sehingga Karyawan Dipacu untuk lebih aktif dalam pembelajaran sehingga dapat menerapkan Sistem ini dengan Baik Nantinya. Pusat Jasa Konsultan ISO 9001 Berpengalaman di Gorontalo Utara

Tag :
Konsultan ISO 9001 | Pusat Jasa Konsultan ISO 9001 Berpengalaman di Gorontalo Utara

Training OHSAS 18001 Terbaik dan Berpengalaman di Solok Selatan

Training OHSAS 18001 Terbaik dan Berpengalaman di Solok Selatan | Hubungi : 0857 1027 2813 PT Bintang Solusi Utama adalah Jasa Konsultan ISO 9001, Consultant ISO 14001, Konsultan ISO 22000, OHSAS 18001, Penyusunan Dokumen CSMS-K3LL, K3, ISO/TS 16949,Dll yang BERANI memberikan JAMINAN KELULUSAN & MONEYBACK GUARANTEE ( Tanpa Terkecuali ) yang tertuang dalam kontrak kerja. Sebagai Konsultan ISO dan HSE TERBAIK dan BERPENGALAMAN kami siap membantu perusahaan bapak dan ibu dalam membangun sistem manajemen ISO dan HSE dengan pendekatan yang sistematis tanpa ribet dengan tujuan bagaimana sistem ISO tersebut bisa bermanfaat bagi perkembangan perusahaan serta menjadi pondasi yang kuat untuk kemajuan perusahaan. Training OHSAS 18001 Terbaik dan Berpengalaman di Solok Selatan

Tak ada lagi alasan untuk malas berolahraga. Dengan kegiatan olahraga ringan, seperti berjalan kaki, penyakit batu ginjal yang menyakitkan bisa dicegah.

Saco-Indonesia.com - Tak ada lagi alasan untuk malas berolahraga. Dengan kegiatan olahraga ringan, seperti berjalan kaki, penyakit batu ginjal yang menyakitkan bisa dicegah.

Penyakit batu ginjal bakal diderita sekitar 9 persen orang dalam hidupnya. Penyakit ini kebanyakan diderita kaum pria, tetapi dalam beberapa tahun terakhir insiden pada kaum wanita naik sampai 70 persen.

Ada beberapa faktor risiko penyakit batu ginjal, antara lain obesitas serta konsumsi suplemen kalsium yang kebanyakan dilakoni wanita usia menopause. Karena itu di AS, pemerintahnya tak menyarankan wanita usia lanjut mengonsumsi suplemen kalsium karena tak terbukti menguatkan tulang, malah meningkatkan risiko batu ginjal.

Dalam penelitian terbaru yang melibatkan hampir 85.000 wanita  berusia 50 tahun ke atas, para peneliti melakukan survei mengenai pola makan para responden untuk mengetahui kaitannya dengan risiko batu ginjal.

Selain itu para partisipan juga ditanyakan kebiasaanya berolahraga dan seberapa besar usaha yang dilakukan atau disebut METs (measure of how much effort an activity takes). Misalnya, 10 mETs per meinggu adalah sekitar 2,5 jam jalan kaki dalam kecepatan sedang, empat jam berkebun, atau satu jam jogging.

Tiga tahu kemudian, sebanyak 3 persen responden menderita batu ginjal. Dibandingkan dengan wanita yang tak pernah melakukan olahraga ringan, mereka yang memiliki nilai METs 5 perminggu, risikonya terkena batu ginjal 16 persen lebih rendah.

Makin tinggi nilai METs para responden, makin rendah risiko mereka terkena batu ginjal.

"Kami tidak meminta orang untuk berlari marathon. Cukup lakukan olahraga ringan sampai moderat untuk mendapatkan manfaat pencegahan batu ginjal," kata Dr.Mathew Sorensen dari University of Washington School of Medicine di Seattle.

Ia menjelaskan, olahraga akan mengubah cara tubuh menangani nutrisi dan cairan yang berpengaruh pada terbentuknya batu ginjal.

Keringat yang keluar saat berolahraga juga membawa garam dan mempertahankan kalsium tetap di tulang, sehingga tidak masuk ke ginjal dan urin dimana batu ginjal terbentuk.

Orang yang rajin berolahraga juga cenderung lebih banyak minum sehingga bisa mencegah pembentukan batu ginjal.

 

Sumber :AP/Kompas.com
Editor:Maulana Lee

TAHUKAH KAMU?? Mumler, Fotografer yang Pertama Kali Memotret Hantu

TAHUKAH KAMU??
Mumler, Fotografer yang Pertama Kali Memotret Hantu

William H. Mumler (1832 -1884) adalah seorang fotografer arwah Amerika yang bekerja di New York dan Boston. Foto arwah pertamanya adalah potret diri yang dikembangkan untuk tampaknya menunjukkan almarhum sepupunya. Mumler kemudian meninggalkan pekerjaannya sebagai perhiasan, dan bukannya memilih untuk bekerja penuh waktu sebagai fotografer, mengambil keuntungan dari sejumlah besar orang-orang yang telah kehilangan sanak keluarga dalam Perang Saudara Amerika. Mungkin dua karya yang paling terkenal adalah foto Mary Todd Lincoln dengan arwah suaminya Abraham Lincoln, dan foto Master Herrod, sebuah media, dengan tiga arwah pemandunya.

Setelah dituduh berbagai kegiatan, ia dibawa ke pengadilan untuk penipuan, dengan mencatat pemain sandiwara PT Barnum memberikan kesaksian terhadap dia. Meskipun dinyatakan tidak bersalah, kariernya sudah berakhir, dan ia meninggal dalam kemiskinan. Foto-foto Mumler dianggap palsu.

Sebelum memulai karirnya sebagai fotografer arwah, Mumler bekerja sebagai pengukir permata di Boston, berlatih fotografi amatir di waktu senggang. Pada awal 1860 -an, ia mengembangkan sebuah potret diri yang muncul untuk menampilkan penampakan sepupunya yang sudah mati selama 12 tahun.Hal ini secara luas diakui sebagai yang pertama foto roh seorang subjek hidup yang menampilkan keserupaan dengan orang yang telah meninggal (seringkali seorang kerabat) tercetak dengan arwah almarhum . Mumler kemudian menjadi fotografer arwah, dan pindah ke New York, di mana karyanya dianalisa oleh sejumlah pakar fotografi, tidak satu pun yang bisa menemukan bukti bahwa foto-fotonya adalah palsu.Fotografi arwah diyakini menjadi bisnis yang menguntungkan kepada keluarga mereka yang tewas selama Perang Saudara Amerika mencari kepastian bahwa di mana mereka tinggal.

Pengkritik karya Mumler termasuk PT Barnum, yang mengaku Mumler adalah mengambil keuntungan dari orang-orang yang sedang dalam kesedihan. Setelah penemuan bahwa beberapa hantu Mumler itu sesungguhnya orang-orang hidup,dan tuduhan bahwa ia telah patah ke rumah-rumah untuk mencuri foto-foto almarhum kerabat,Mumler dibawa ke pengadilan atas penipuan pada bulan April 1869.Barnum bersaksi melawan dia, mempekerjakan Abraham Bogardus untuk membuat gambar yang muncul untuk menunjukkan Barnum dengan arwah Abraham Lincoln untuk menunjukkan kemudahan dengan foto-foto yang dapat diciptakan.Mereka yang bersaksi dalam mendukung Mumler termasuk Musa A. Dow, seorang wartawan yang Mumler telah memotret. Meskipun dibebaskan dari penipuan, karier Mumler rusak dan dia meninggal di kemiskinan pada tahun 1884. Foto-nya dianggap hoax dan hanya rekayasa.
---------------------------------

admin @07uni10

WASHINGTON — The former deputy director of the C.I.A. asserts in a forthcoming book that Republicans, in their eagerness to politicize the killing of the American ambassador to Libya, repeatedly distorted the agency’s analysis of events. But he also argues that the C.I.A. should get out of the business of providing “talking points” for administration officials in national security events that quickly become partisan, as happened after the Benghazi attack in 2012.

The official, Michael J. Morell, dismisses the allegation that the United States military and C.I.A. officers “were ordered to stand down and not come to the rescue of their comrades,” and he says there is “no evidence” to support the charge that “there was a conspiracy between C.I.A. and the White House to spin the Benghazi story in a way that would protect the political interests of the president and Secretary Clinton,” referring to the secretary of state at the time, Hillary Rodham Clinton.

But he also concludes that the White House itself embellished some of the talking points provided by the Central Intelligence Agency and had blocked him from sending an internal study of agency conclusions to Congress.

Photo
 
Michael J. Morell Credit Mark Wilson/Getty Images

“I finally did so without asking,” just before leaving government, he writes, and after the White House released internal emails to a committee investigating the State Department’s handling of the issue.

A lengthy congressional investigation remains underway, one that many Republicans hope to use against Mrs. Clinton in the 2016 election cycle.

In parts of the book, “The Great War of Our Time” (Twelve), Mr. Morell praises his C.I.A. colleagues for many successes in stopping terrorist attacks, but he is surprisingly critical of other C.I.A. failings — and those of the National Security Agency.

Soon after Mr. Morell retired in 2013 after 33 years in the agency, President Obama appointed him to a commission reviewing the actions of the National Security Agency after the disclosures of Edward J. Snowden, a former intelligence contractor who released classified documents about the government’s eavesdropping abilities. Mr. Morell writes that he was surprised by what he found.

Advertisement

“You would have thought that of all the government entities on the planet, the one least vulnerable to such grand theft would have been the N.S.A.,” he writes. “But it turned out that the N.S.A. had left itself vulnerable.”

He concludes that most Wall Street firms had better cybersecurity than the N.S.A. had when Mr. Snowden swept information from its systems in 2013. While he said he found himself “chagrined by how well the N.S.A. was doing” compared with the C.I.A. in stepping up its collection of data on intelligence targets, he also sensed that the N.S.A., which specializes in electronic spying, was operating without considering the implications of its methods.

“The N.S.A. had largely been collecting information because it could, not necessarily in all cases because it should,” he says.

The book is to be released next week.

Mr. Morell was a career analyst who rose through the ranks of the agency, and he ended up in the No. 2 post. He served as President George W. Bush’s personal intelligence briefer in the first months of his presidency — in those days, he could often be spotted at the Starbucks in Waco, Tex., catching up on his reading — and was with him in the schoolhouse in Florida on the morning of Sept. 11, 2001, when the Bush presidency changed in an instant.

Mr. Morell twice took over as acting C.I.A. director, first when Leon E. Panetta was appointed secretary of defense and then when retired Gen. David H. Petraeus resigned over an extramarital affair with his biographer, a relationship that included his handing her classified notes of his time as America’s best-known military commander.

Mr. Morell says he first learned of the affair from Mr. Petraeus only the night before he resigned, and just as the Benghazi events were turning into a political firestorm. While praising Mr. Petraeus, who had told his deputy “I am very lucky” to run the C.I.A., Mr. Morell writes that “the organization did not feel the same way about him.” The former general “created the impression through the tone of his voice and his body language that he did not want people to disagree with him (which was not true in my own interaction with him),” he says.

But it is his account of the Benghazi attacks — and how the C.I.A. was drawn into the debate over whether the Obama White House deliberately distorted its account of the death of Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens — that is bound to attract attention, at least partly because of its relevance to the coming presidential election. The initial assessments that the C.I.A. gave to the White House said demonstrations had preceded the attack. By the time analysts reversed their opinion, Susan E. Rice, now the national security adviser, had made a series of statements on Sunday talk shows describing the initial assessment. The controversy and other comments Ms. Rice made derailed Mr. Obama’s plan to appoint her as secretary of state.

The experience prompted Mr. Morell to write that the C.I.A. should stay out of the business of preparing talking points — especially on issues that are being seized upon for “political purposes.” He is critical of the State Department for not beefing up security in Libya for its diplomats, as the C.I.A., he said, did for its employees.

But he concludes that the assault in which the ambassador was killed took place “with little or no advance planning” and “was not well organized.” He says the attackers “did not appear to be looking for Americans to harm. They appeared intent on looting and conducting some vandalism,” setting fires that killed Mr. Stevens and a security official, Sean Smith.

Mr. Morell paints a picture of an agency that was struggling, largely unsuccessfully, to understand dynamics in the Middle East and North Africa when the Arab Spring broke out in late 2011 in Tunisia. The agency’s analysts failed to see the forces of revolution coming — and then failed again, he writes, when they told Mr. Obama that the uprisings would undercut Al Qaeda by showing there was a democratic pathway to change.

“There is no good explanation for our not being able to see the pressures growing to dangerous levels across the region,” he writes. The agency had again relied too heavily “on a handful of strong leaders in the countries of concern to help us understand what was going on in the Arab street,” he says, and those leaders themselves were clueless.

Moreover, an agency that has always overvalued secretly gathered intelligence and undervalued “open source” material “was not doing enough to mine the wealth of information available through social media,” he writes. “We thought and told policy makers that this outburst of popular revolt would damage Al Qaeda by undermining the group’s narrative,” he writes.

Instead, weak governments in Egypt, and the absence of governance from Libya to Yemen, were “a boon to Islamic extremists across both the Middle East and North Africa.”

Mr. Morell is gentle about most of the politicians he dealt with — he expresses admiration for both Mr. Bush and Mr. Obama, though he accuses former Vice President Dick Cheney of deliberately implying a connection between Al Qaeda and Iraq that the C.I.A. had concluded probably did not exist. But when it comes to the events leading up to the Bush administration’s decision to go to war in Iraq, he is critical of his own agency.

Mr. Morell concludes that the Bush White House did not have to twist intelligence on Saddam Hussein’s alleged effort to rekindle the country’s work on weapons of mass destruction.

“The view that hard-liners in the Bush administration forced the intelligence community into its position on W.M.D. is just flat wrong,” he writes. “No one pushed. The analysts were already there and they had been there for years, long before Bush came to office.”

Mr. Pfaff was an international affairs columnist and author who found Washington’s intervention in world affairs often misguided.

Artikel lainnya »