Tempat Jasa Konsultan ISO 9001 Berpengalaman di Mimika
Anda Mencari Tempat Jasa Konsultan ISO 9001 Berpengalaman di Mimika Kami Solusinya Hubungi : 0857 1027 2813 konsultaniso9001.net adalah Jasa Konsultan ISO 9001, Consultant ISO 14001, Konsultan ISO 22000, OHSAS 18001, Penyusunan Dokumen CSMS-K3LL, K3, ISO/TS 16949,Dll yang BERANI memberikan JAMINAN KELULUSAN & MONEYBACK GUARANTEE ( Tanpa Terkecuali ) yang tertuang dalam kontrak kerja. Sebagai Konsultan ISO dan HSE TERBAIK dan BERPENGALAMAN kami siap membantu perusahaan bapak dan ibu dalam membangun sistem manajemen ISO dan HSE dengan pendekatan yang sistematis tanpa ribet dengan tujuan bagaimana sistem ISO tersebut bisa bermanfaat bagi perkembangan perusahaan serta menjadi pondasi yang kuat untuk kemajuan perusahaan.
Tempat Jasa Konsultan ISO 9001 Berpengalaman di Mimika Melalui berbagai TRAINING ISO yang diselenggarakan menggunakan Metode Accelerated Learning, sehingga Karyawan Dipacu untuk lebih aktif dalam pembelajaran sehingga dapat menerapkan Sistem ini dengan Baik Nantinya. Tempat Jasa Konsultan ISO 9001 Berpengalaman di Mimika
Jasa Training ISO 27001 di Pariaman | Hubungi : 0857 1027 2813 PT Bintang Solusi Utama adalah Jasa Konsultan ISO 9001, Consultant ISO 14001, Konsultan ISO 22000, OHSAS 18001, Penyusunan Dokumen CSMS-K3LL, K3, ISO/TS 16949,Dll yang BERANI memberikan JAMINAN KELULUSAN & MONEYBACK GUARANTEE ( Tanpa Terkecuali ) yang tertuang dalam kontrak kerja. Sebagai Konsultan ISO dan HSE TERBAIK dan BERPENGALAMAN kami siap membantu perusahaan bapak dan ibu dalam membangun sistem manajemen ISO dan HSE dengan pendekatan yang sistematis tanpa ribet dengan tujuan bagaimana sistem ISO tersebut bisa bermanfaat bagi perkembangan perusahaan serta menjadi pondasi yang kuat untuk kemajuan perusahaan. Jasa Training ISO 27001 di Pariaman
BINTARO XCHANGE MALL
Jangan pernah menyerah sampai anda benar-benar menemukan Bintaro Xchange Mall yang paling ampuh supaya produk yang anda jajakan
Jangan pernah menyerah sampai anda benar-benar menemukan Bintaro Xchange Mall yang paling ampuh supaya produk yang anda jajakan lewat internet bisa laris manis. Untuk itu tetaplah disana dan simak terus apa yang akan kami bagikan seputar cara meningkatkan penjualan online ini untuk anda semua. Di dirikan di kawasan Bintaro Jaya, Bintaro Xchange Mall langsung menjadi ebuah ikon gaya hidup bagi Bintaro jaya, karena dengan berbagai fitur yang di suguhkan guna untuk menarik para pengunjungnya dan membuat mereka senyaman mungkin menjadikan Mall di Jakarta ini sebagai salah satu mall paling pavorit untuk di kunjungi, baik untuk berbelanja keperluan anda maupun untuk sekedar memanjakan lidah dengan menikmati berbagai sajian kulinernya yang lezat.
Di Ibu kota ada banyak sekali Mall yang udah ada dan mungkin beberapa diantaranya anda pernah berkunjung ke sana, namun yang satu ini begitu berbeda sehingga anda harus mengunjunginya demi membunuh rasa penasaran anda, dan sekali anda berkunjung ke Mall di Jakarta yang atu ini, maka anda akan selalu mengunjunginya setidak nya di waktu akhir pekan anda.
Mall di Jakarta tepatnya di selatan Jakarta yang satu ini akan memberikan kesan yang cukup berarti dalam etiap kunjungan anda, dan dijamin sekali saja anda mengunjunginya maka anda akan ketagihan untuk kunjungan-kunjungan berikutnya, kenapa? Karena semua fasoilitas pendukung di Mall di Jakarta yang satu ini akan sangat memanjakan semua pengunjungnya termasuk anda.
Berbicara tentang Mall di Jakarta, mungkin sobat semua sudah tahu banyak tentang beberapa Mall di Jakarta yang bahkan mungkin beberapa diantaranya pernah sobat kunjungi. Nah ada satu lagi nich Mall di Jakarta yang baru saja i luncurkan yakni Bintaro Xchange Mall. Apakah anda sudah pernah mendengar namanya? Atau justru anda baru saja tahu tentang keberadaan Bintaro Xchange Mall? Hal itu wajar saja, mengingat Mall yang atu ini baru saja di launching.
Mungkin di suatu saat akan menjadi sebuah paradigma, kalau belum ke Bintaro Xchange Mall rasanya belum lengkap ke Jakarta sebagaimana sebuah paradigma yang melekat di benak para turis asing bahwa kalau belum berkunjung Bali rasanya belumkunjung ke Indonesia.
Mungkin anda pernah berjalan-jalan di salah atu Mall di Jakarta? Tentu saja bukan? Dan apa yang anda rasakan? Relatif, masing-masing mempunyai kesan yang berbeda ketika mengunjungi suatu temtap. Bukankah demikian? Namun demikian apakah anda sudah pernah mengunjungi Mall di Jakarta yang satu ini? Dimana? Itu loh salah satu mall di Bintaro Jaya yang baru saja diluncurkan beberapa waktu yang lau, oh Bintaro Xchange Mall maksudnya? Betul sekali kawan, cobalah di suatu waktu mengunjunginya dan anda akan mendapatkan layanan yang memanjakan di Mall di Jakarta yang atu ini.
Informasi penting lainnya yang saat ini kami bagikan untuk anda adalah tentang sebuah toko kamera murah yang lagi trend dan juga banyak dibicarakan di media online. Untuk teman semua yang membutuhkan kamera murah maka anda perlu untuk berkunjung ke Bintaro Xchange Mall dan dapatkan kamera anda dengan harga paling murah.
MEMBANGUN JASA PENGIRIMAN BARANG
Perkembangan jasa kirim barang tampaknya memang cukup banyak dipengaruhi oleh semakin menjamurnya transaksi jual beli online. Ti
Perkembangan jasa kirim barang tampaknya memang cukup banyak dipengaruhi oleh semakin menjamurnya transaksi jual beli online. Tidak dapat dipungkiri bahwa budaya jual beli online yang semakin dikenal oleh masyarakat turut memberikan pengaruh terhadap pertumbuhan jasa kirim barang. Bahkan mungkin Anda juga termasuk salah satu pelaku pasar online yang pernah terlibat dalam aktivitas jual beli online ini. Saat ada orang yang membeli barang secara online, tentunya pengiriman barang tidak selalu bisa ditangani sendirian. Dibutuhkan layanan yang bisa diandalkan. Jika Anda ingin membangun usaha kirim barang, tentunya Anda perlu memahami point-point yang banyak dipertimbangkan oleh para pengguna.
Di Jakarta sendiri ada begitu banyak jasa kirim barang Jakarta. Jasa pengiriman tersebut tidak hanya fokus pada wilayah Jakarta saja. Wilayah di luar Jakarta juga bisa dicapai. Karena banyaknya jasa kirim barang di Jakarta, tentunya penting bagi para pengguna layanan untuk dapat mengetahui bagaimana cara memilih jasa pengiriman yang tepat. Bagi Anda sendiri, informasi ini bisa memberikan gambaran mengenai cara memikat dan membuat pelanggan percaya kepada pelayanan Anda.
Cara termudah untuk dapat menemukan jasa kirim barang jakarta yang dapat diandalkan adalah dengan mempertimbangkan popularitas dari penyedia layanan tersebut. Nama baik pastinya tidak muncul begitu saja. Semua itu ada karena pelayanan yang diberikan memang baik dan selalu berhasil memuaskan sebagian besar pelanggannya. Bagi Anda, untuk meraih hal tersebut tentunya tidak bisa dilakukan dalam waktu singkat. Anda juga harus membangunnya dari bawah. Pertama bangun brand yang kuat. Caranya dengan memberikan pelayanan terbaik dan selalu berusaha untuk dapat memuaskan pelanggan.
Selanjutnya jumlah armada yang dimiliki. Agar mampu untuk memberikan pelayanan yang baik dan mengirim barang dengan cepat, tentunya dibutuhkan armada yang cukup. Untuk itu, persiapkan armada yang cukup. Untuk awal-awal, tidak harus banyak. Awali dengan mengcover wilayah tertentu dan tawarkan apa yang tidak ditawarkan oleh jasa pengiriman barang jakarta lainnya. Selain itu pikat pelanggan dengan harga yang bersaing. Harga pasti selalu menjadi pertimbangan penting. Dengan harga yang bersaing, jasa pengiriman barang Anda pastinya akan dilirik oleh pengguna jasa pengiriman barang.
Finding Scandal in New York and New Jersey, but No Shame
From sea to shining sea, or at least from one side of the Hudson to the other, politicians you have barely heard of are being accused of wrongdoing. There were so many court proceedings involving public officials on Monday that it was hard to keep up.
In Newark, two underlings of Gov. Chris Christie were arraigned on charges that they were in on the truly deranged plot to block traffic leading onto the George Washington Bridge.
Ten miles away, in Lower Manhattan, Dean G. Skelos, the leader of the New York State Senate, and his son, Adam B. Skelos, were arrested by the Federal Bureau of Investigation on accusations of far more conventional political larceny, involving a job with a sewer company for the son and commissions on title insurance and bond work.
The younger man managed to receive a 150 percent pay increase from the sewer company even though, as he said on tape, he “literally knew nothing about water or, you know, any of that stuff,” according to a criminal complaint the United States attorney’s office filed.
The bridge traffic caper is its own species of crazy; what distinguishes the charges against the two Skeloses is the apparent absence of a survival instinct. It is one thing not to know anything about water or that stuff. More remarkable, if true, is the fact that the sewer machinations continued even after the former New York Assembly speaker, Sheldon Silver, was charged in January with taking bribes disguised as fees.
It was by then common gossip in political and news media circles that Senator Skelos, a Republican, the counterpart in the Senate to Mr. Silver, a Democrat, in the Assembly, could be next in line for the criminal dock. “Stay tuned,” the United States attorney, Preet Bharara said, leaving not much to the imagination.
Even though the cat had been unmistakably belled, Skelos father and son continued to talk about how to advance the interests of the sewer company, though the son did begin to use a burner cellphone, the kind people pay for in cash, with no traceable contracts.
That was indeed prudent, as prosecutors had been wiretapping the cellphones of both men. But it would seem that the burner was of limited value, because by then the prosecutors had managed to secure the help of a business executive who agreed to record calls with the Skeloses. It would further seem that the business executive was more attentive to the perils of pending investigations than the politician.
Through the end of the New York State budget negotiations in March, the hopes of the younger Skelos rested on his father’s ability to devise legislation that would benefit the sewer company. That did not pan out. But Senator Skelos did boast that he had haggled with Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo, a Democrat, in a successful effort to raise a $150 million allocation for Long Island to $550 million, for what the budget called “transformative economic development projects.” It included money for the kind of work done by the sewer company.
The lawyer for Adam Skelos said he was not guilty and would win in court. Senator Skelos issued a ringing declaration that he was unequivocally innocent.
THIS was also the approach taken in New Jersey by Bill Baroni, a man of great presence and eloquence who stopped outside the federal courthouse to note that he had taken risks as a Republican by bucking his party to support paid family leave, medical marijuana and marriage equality. “I would never risk my career, my job, my reputation for something like this,” Mr. Baroni said. “I am an innocent man.”
The lawyer for his co-defendant, Bridget Anne Kelly, the former deputy chief of staff to Mr. Christie, a Republican, said that she would strongly rebut the charges.
Perhaps they had nothing to do with the lane closings. But neither Mr. Baroni nor Ms. Kelly addressed the question of why they did not return repeated calls from the mayor of Fort Lee, N.J., begging them to stop the traffic tie-ups, over three days.
That silence was a low moment. But perhaps New York hit bottom faster. Senator Skelos, the prosecutors charged, arranged to meet Long Island politicians at the wake of Wenjian Liu, a New York City police officer shot dead in December, to press for payments to the company employing his son.
Sometimes it seems as though for some people, the only thing to be ashamed of is shame itself.
But an unusual assortment of players, including furniture makers, the Chinese government, Republicans from states with a large base of furniture manufacturing and even some Democrats who championed early regulatory efforts, have questioned the E.P.A. proposal. The sustained opposition has held sway, as the agency is now preparing to ease key testing requirements before it releases the landmark federal health standard.
The E.P.A.’s five-year effort to adopt this rule offers another example of how industry opposition can delay and hamper attempts by the federal government to issue regulations, even to control substances known to be harmful to human health.
Formaldehyde is a known carcinogen that can also cause respiratory ailments like asthma, but the potential of long-term exposure to cause cancers like myeloid leukemia is less well understood.
The E.P.A.’s decision would be the first time that the federal government has regulated formaldehyde inside most American homes.
“The stakes are high for public health,” said Tom Neltner, senior adviser for regulatory affairs at the National Center for Healthy Housing, who has closely monitored the debate over the rules. “What we can’t have here is an outcome that fails to confront the health threat we all know exists.”
The proposal would not ban formaldehyde — commonly used as an ingredient in wood glue in furniture and flooring — but it would impose rules that prevent dangerous levels of the chemical’s vapors from those products, and would set testing standards to ensure that products sold in the United States comply with those limits. The debate has sharpened in the face of growing concern about the safety of formaldehyde-treated flooring imported from Asia, especially China.
What is certain is that a lot of money is at stake: American companies sell billions of dollars’ worth of wood products each year that contain formaldehyde, and some argue that the proposed regulation would impose unfair costs and restrictions.
Determined to block the agency’s rule as proposed, these industry players have turned to the White House, members of Congress and top E.P.A. officials, pressing them to roll back the testing requirements in particular, calling them redundant and too expensive.
“There are potentially over a million manufacturing jobs that will be impacted if the proposed rule is finalized without changes,” wrote Bill Perdue, the chief lobbyist at the American Home Furnishings Alliance, a leading critic of the testing requirements in the proposed regulation, in one letter to the E.P.A.
Industry opposition helped create an odd alignment of forces working to thwart the rule. The White House moved to strike out key aspects of the proposal. Subsequent appeals for more changes were voiced by players as varied as Senator Barbara Boxer, Democrat of California, and Senator Roger Wicker, Republican of Mississippi, as well as furniture industry lobbyists.
Hurricane Katrina in 2005 helped ignite the public debate over formaldehyde, after the deadly storm destroyed or damaged hundreds of thousands of homes along the Gulf of Mexico, forcing families into temporary trailers provided by the Federal Emergency Management Agency.
The displaced storm victims quickly began reporting respiratory problems, burning eyes and other issues, and tests then confirmed high levels of formaldehyde fumes leaking into the air inside the trailers, which in many cases had been hastily constructed.
Public health advocates petitioned the E.P.A. to issue limits on formaldehyde in building materials and furniture used in homes, given that limits already existed for exposure in workplaces. But three years after the storm, only California had issued such limits.
Industry groups like the American Chemistry Council have repeatedly challenged the science linking formaldehyde to cancer, a position championed by David Vitter, the Republican senator from Louisiana, who is a major recipient of chemical industry campaign contributions, and whom environmental groups have mockingly nicknamed “Senator Formaldehyde.”
By 2010, public health advocates and some industry groups secured bipartisan support in Congress for legislation that ordered the E.P.A. to issue federal rules that largely mirrored California’s restrictions. At the time, concerns were rising over the growing number of lower-priced furniture imports from Asia that might include contaminated products, while also hurting sales of American-made products.
Maneuvering began almost immediately after the E.P.A. prepared draft rules to formally enact the new standards.
White House records show at least five meetings in mid-2012 with industry executives — kitchen cabinet makers, chemical manufacturers, furniture trade associations and their lobbyists, like Brock R. Landry, of the Venable law firm. These parties, along with Senator Vitter’s office, appealed to top administration officials, asking them to intervene to roll back the E.P.A. proposal.
The White House Office of Management and Budget, which reviews major federal regulations before they are adopted, apparently agreed. After the White House review, the E.P.A. “redlined” many of the estimates of the monetary benefits that would be gained by reductions in related health ailments, like asthma and fertility issues, documents reviewed by The New York Times show.
As a result, the estimated benefit of the proposed rule dropped to $48 million a year, from as much as $278 million a year. The much-reduced amount deeply weakened the agency’s justification for the sometimes costly new testing that would be required under the new rules, a federal official involved in the effort said.
“It’s a redlining blood bath,” said Lisa Heinzerling, a Georgetown University Law School professor and a former E.P.A. official, using the Washington phrase to describe when language is stricken from a proposed rule. “Almost the entire discussion of these potential benefits was excised.”
“That’s a huge difference,” said Luke Bolar, a spokesman for Mr. Vitter, of the reduced estimated financial benefits, saying the change was “clearly highlighting more mismanagement” at the E.P.A.
The review’s outcome galvanized opponents in the furniture industry. They then targeted a provision that mandated new testing of laminated wood, a cheaper alternative to hardwood. (The California standard on which the law was based did not require such testing.)
But E.P.A. scientists had concluded that these laminate products — millions of which are sold annually in the United States — posed a particular risk. They said that when thin layers of wood, also known as laminate or veneer, are added to furniture or flooring in the final stages of manufacturing, the resulting product can generate dangerous levels of fumes from often-used formaldehyde-based glues.
Industry executives, outraged by what they considered an unnecessary and financially burdensome level of testing, turned every lever within reach to get the requirement removed. It would be particularly onerous, they argued, for small manufacturers that would have to repeatedly interrupt their work to do expensive new testing. The E.P.A. estimated that the expanded requirements for laminate products would cost the furniture industry tens of millions of dollars annually, while the industry said that the proposed rule over all would cost its 7,000 American manufacturing facilities over $200 million each year.
“A lot of people don’t seem to appreciate what a lot of these requirements do to a small operation,” said Dick Titus, executive vice president of the Kitchen Cabinet Manufacturers Association, whose members are predominantly small businesses. “A 10-person shop, for example, just really isn’t equipped to handle that type of thing.”
Big industry players also weighed in. Executives from companies including La-Z-Boy, Hooker Furniture and Ashley Furniture all flew to Washington for a series of meetings with the offices of lawmakers including House Speaker John Boehner, Republican of Ohio, and about a dozen other lawmakers, asking several of them to sign a letter prepared by the industry to press the E.P.A. to back down, according to an industry report describing the lobbying visit.
The industry lobbyists also held their own meeting at E.P.A. headquarters, and they urged Jim Jones, who oversaw the rule-making process as the assistant administrator for the agency’s Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention, to visit a North Carolina furniture manufacturing plant. According to the trade group, Mr. Jones told them that the visit had “helped the agency shift its thinking” about the rules and how laminated products should be treated.
The resistance was particularly intense from lawmakers like Mr. Wicker of Mississippi, whose state is home to major manufacturing plants owned by Ashley Furniture Industries, the world’s largest furniture maker, and who is one of the biggest recipients in Congress of donations from the industry’s trade association. Asked if the political support played a role, a spokesman for Mr. Wicker replied: “Thousands of Mississippians depend on the furniture manufacturing industry for their livelihoods. Senator Wicker is committed to defending all Mississippians from government overreach.”
Individual companies like Ikea also intervened, as did the Chinese government, which claimed that the new rule would create a “great barrier” to the import of Chinese products because of higher costs.
Perhaps the most surprising objection came from Senator Boxer, of California, a longtime environmental advocate, whose office questioned why the E.P.A.’s rule went further than her home state’s in seeking testing on laminated products. “We did not advocate an outcome, other than safety,” her office said in a statement about why the senator raised concerns. “We said ‘Take a look to see if you have it right.’ ”
Safety advocates say that tighter restrictions — like the ones Ms. Boxer and Mr. Wicker, along with Representative Doris Matsui, a California Democrat, have questioned — are necessary, particularly for products coming from China, where items as varied as toys and Christmas lights have been found to violate American safety standards.
While Mr. Neltner, the environmental advocate who has been most involved in the review process, has been open to compromise, he has pressed the E.P.A. not to back down entirely, and to maintain a requirement that laminators verify that their products are safe.
An episode of CBS’s “60 Minutes” in March brought attention to the issue when it accused Lumber Liquidators, the discount flooring retailer, of selling laminate products with dangerous levels of formaldehyde. The company has disputed the show’s findings and test methods, maintaining that its products are safe.
“People think that just because Congress passed the legislation five years ago, the problem has been fixed,” said Becky Gillette, who then lived in coastal Mississippi, in the area hit by Hurricane Katrina, and was among the first to notice a pattern of complaints from people living in the trailers. “Real people’s faces and names come up in front of me when I think of the thousands of people who could get sick if this rule is not done right.”
An aide to Ms. Matsui rejected any suggestion that she was bending to industry pressure.
“From the beginning the public health has been our No. 1 concern,” said Kyle J. Victor, an aide to Ms. Matsui.
But further changes to the rule are likely, agency officials concede, as they say they are searching for a way to reduce the cost of complying with any final rule while maintaining public health goals. The question is just how radically the agency will revamp the testing requirement for laminated products — if it keeps it at all.
“It’s not a secret to anybody that is the most challenging issue,” said Mr. Jones, the E.P.A. official overseeing the process, adding that the health consequences from formaldehyde are real. “We have to reduce those exposures so that people can live healthy lives and not have to worry about being in their homes.”